Cy pres awards play a critical role in our ability to help people understand their privacy rights and advocate for strong consumer protections.
A cy pres award is a distribution of funds from a class action settlement to an organization that comes as near as possible to the interests of the class. Often these are funds remaining after settlement funds have been distributed to class members.
We use funding from cy pres awards to educate people about their privacy rights and choices, research emerging consumer privacy issues, create and improve research tools like our Data Breach Chronology and our Data Broker Database, and weigh in on policy proceedings with a consumer rights perspective.
At Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, we have been fortunate to be court-approved recipients of a number of cy pres awards in consumer privacy cases. If you are researching cy pres recipients for a case, and believe Privacy Rights Clearinghouse may be an appropriate recipient, please feel free to reach out to us at 619-298-3396 or support@privacyrights.org.
Privacy Rights Clearinghouse has been named a cy pres recipient in many privacy-related cases, including:
In re Plaid, Inc. Privacy Litigation
Larson v. Harman-Management Corp.
Bailey v. Six Flags
In re Vizio, Inc. Consumer Privacy Litigation
Hashw v. Department Stores National Bank and FDS Bank
Virgine v. CR England
Cohen v. Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency et. al.
Sims v. Simply Fashion
Seegert v. PF Changs
Johnson v. American Finance & Associates Corp and Does 1-50
In re: Collecto Inc. TCPA Litigation
Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. R.M. Galicia Inc. dba Progressive Management Systems
Connolly v. Umpqua Bank
Robinson v. Paramount Equity Mortgage
Mount v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
People of Calif. v. Wells Fargo Bank
Stone v. Howard Johnson International Inc.
Doe v. Twitter
Nicolucci v. Sephora USA, Inc.
In. re: Netflix Privacy Litigation
Holmes v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
Syran v. LexisNexis Group
Kaye et. al. v. Aesthera Corp
Wang v. Asset Acceptance, et. al.
Main et. al. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.