Submitted by the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
October 27, 2004
Federal Trade Commission
Office of the Secretary, Room H-159 (Annex H)
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580
Filed electronically: https://secure.commentworks.com/ftcprescreen/
The Privacy Rights Clearinghouse urges California voters to oppose the November 2nd ballot initiative Proposition 64, which limits the enforcement of laws that protect against consumer abuses, polluters, and privacy violations. We also urge those who are interested in learning more about the mischaracterization of “trial lawyers” and “shakedown” lawsuits as a national issue, to read on.
A photo of Samantha's child was posted on the school's website (along with the entire student body)—grouped by grade/teacher with a list of the child's itinerary. After learning of this, Samantha asked the school in writing to remove her child's photo and provide her with a copy of the policy giving them the right to post the photo without her permission.
A growing number of websites sell (or give freely) the personal information of individuals. These online information brokers (also known as data brokers or data vendors) gather personal information from many sources including white pages listings (directory assistance), publicly-available sources and public records. Some information brokers also offer the ability to conduct "social searches," which gather information by searching public profiles on social networking sites.
Update Nov. 5: Unfortunately, Prop. 69 passed in the Nov. 2 Elections by a 62% to 38% margin.
The Privacy Rights Clearinghouse is urging Californians to vote against an extremely troubling and misleading initiative in the upcoming November 2nd election. Proposition 69, called the “DNA Samples. Collection. Database. Funding. Initiative Statute” significantly expands the collection of DNA from convicted felons and from individuals who have been arrested.
Some patients who get their prescriptions filled through supermarket pharmacies and chain drug stores such as Albertson's, Walgreens, RiteAid, SavOn and CVS may be surprised to get a solicitation in the mail that looks like a friendly reminder to refill their prescription. The solicitation might also suggest that they try a different brand of the same medication.
Contact:
Beth Givens – Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
619.298.3396, bethg(at)privacyrights.org
Linda Gross – LCG Communications
718.853.5568, linda(at)lcgcommunications.com
Lou Gordon– 212.219.7777; lougordon77(at)hotmail.com
Update, September 29, 2004. California Governor Schwarzenegger signed SB 1436 into law today, ignoring the advice of technology experts and consumer advocates to veto it.
The Honorable Arnold Schwarzenegger
Governor of California
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: Recommendation to Veto SB 1436, Spyware
Dear Governor Schwarzenegger:
Contact:
Beth Givens, PRC Director, (619) 298-3396, bethg(at)privacyrights.org
Linda Gross, LCG Communications, (718) 853-5568, linda(at)lcgcommunications.com
Lou Gordon, (212) 219-7777, lougordon77(at)hotmail.com
Q: What is the PRC v. Albertsons case about?
Tim recently discovered that he had been a victim of identity theft for quite some time. Through a phone call from Qwest Wireless' fraud department, he was informed that someone had been using his Social Security number, but they were not able to verify his city/zip and date of birth. He was suggested to file a fraud alert with the credit reporting agencies and get a copy of his credit report.